107 East Second Street
Lampasas, Texas 76550
(512) 556-8234 (office)
(512) 556-8236 (fax)
MEDIATION STRATEGIES FOR RESOLVING
THE CHILD CUSTODY CASE
Presented by Robert Gradel
HIGHLAND LAKES MEDIATORS
MARCH 10, 2004
Problems confronting the mediator in child custody disputes.
There are a number of difficult problems confronting the mediator when
attempting to resolve child custody disputes. The parties are under tremendous
psychological pressure at mediation. On the list of the most difficult and
stressful periods during a person's life, death and divorce are at the very
top. Dad comes into the mediation thinking that the judges and juries are
all biased against men, and mom comes into the mediation thinking that good
mothers always wind up with custody of the children, and if she is not the
primary custodian, everyone (including herself) will believe she must have
done something really bad to "lose" custody of the kids. Another
problem often confronting the mediator is that one or both of the parties
are there simply to have their "ticket punched" prior to trial, and
may be working against you. For example, the lawyer may have been paid a large
sum of money to try the case. If the case settles at mediation, the client
may want to discuss a refund of the retainer. Another problem is lawyer and
client ignorance concerning the actual day to day difference between winning
and losing, sole managing conservatorship and joint managing conservatorship
and the rights and duties of the parties post divorce. Don't be surprised
to find that the client's lawyer is uncooperative, spouting nonsense like
"everyone is entitled to their day in court" or "I don't want
to discuss my trial strategy" when the mediator attempts to discuss the
problems and possible solutions. Sometimes the mediator can engage the client
one on one in the discussions, circumventing and/or educating the attorney
in the process. Occasionally the lawyers will slip up and allow the mediator
to speak to the parties alone without the attorneys being present. An alert
mediator can take advantage of this opportunity to make progress without the
client looking for guidance for every decision from their lawyer. Other obstacles
to settlement include job schedule and distance between the parties. It is
more difficult to co-parent if one spouse is planning to move to Alaska. Lack
of financial resources of one or both of the parties will eliminate many creative
solutions. CPS involvement, psychological reports and other "bad facts"
evidence can shorten the mediation dramatically.
How does the mediator get started?
A glance at the Family Code provides some pretty good talking points the
mediator can use when the mediation begins:
The public policy of this state is to assure that children will have frequent
and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the
best interest of the child. Tex. Fam. Code 153.001(a)(1).
The guidelines in the standard possession order constitute a presumptive
minimum amount of time for possession of a child by a parent named as a
joint managing conservator who is not awarded the exclusive right to
designate the primary residence of the child in a suit. Fam. Code §153.137.
There is a rebuttable presumption that the standard possession order provides
reasonable minimum possession of a child for a parent named as a possessory
conservator and is in the best interest of the child. Tex. Fam. Code §153.252.
It is preferable for all children in a family to be together during periods
of possession. Tex. Fam. Code §153.251(c).
The Court may enter an order that varies or deviates from the standard
order when the parties agree to the deviation. Tex. Fam. Code §153.255.
If the Texas Standard Possession Order (SPO) is inappropriate, the court
is ordered by the Code to modify the possession order and may consider:
- the age, developmental status, circumstances,
needs, and best interest of the child;
- the circumstances of the managing conservator
and of the parent named as a possessory; and
- any other relevant factor. Tex. Fam. Code §153.256.
Another tool at the mediator's disposal has been the change from Wednesday
overnight to Thursday overnight in the SPO. If the non-custodial parent elects
the alternative possession times, this will allow the non-custodial parent
and the children five days in a row every first, third and fifth weekend during
the school year. (Don't forget, weekends always begin on Fridays and not the
previous Thursday overnight.)
The beauty of a mediation, as we all know, is that the parties can tailor
the order to fit their particular circumstances. Prepare a calendar prior
to mediation showing the SPO visitation. I have heard it said that if you
take the SPO and calculate the time the non-custodial parent has with the
children, it is about 38% of the time. The parties are essentially arguing
over 12% of the child's time. I have not gone to the trouble to count each
hour to verify that fact, but I have counted every day during the year each
parent would have contact with their children under the SPO. During a twelve
month period, dad will get to see the children for 192 days out of the year,
with mom having contact on 278 days. I have included in this article a March
and April 2004 calendar for a typical family in which the father is the non-custodial
parent. There are 12 days in which Dad does not have contact with the child,
and 11 days in which Mom has no contact with the child. For April 2004, there
are only 14 days in the month in which Dad does not have contact with the
child. Dad arguably gets the most "quality" time (weekends and holidays)
in which he and the kids can plan excursions, whereas mom has the time that
will necessarily involve barking at the kids to get their homework done and
getting ready for school in the morning.
Another idea to consider at mediation is to negotiate a requirement that
the children reside within a specific school district. This allows the non-custodial
parent to exercise the alternative possession times, and will allow greater
flexibility in writing a workable order. Sometimes the parties will agree
to omit a finding that either parent has the exclusive right to establish
the residence of the child. If the parties agree to a split custody arrangement,
this may cinch the deal by removing evidence of the actual "winner."
I know it sounds cynical, but sometimes money will help bridge the gap
in custody litigation. You may be able to help the parties settle by preying
on their misunderstanding about how much an income tax deduction is actually
worth. In 2004, the exemption for a child is $3,100.00. If mom has a low paying
job making less than $14,000.00 per year, she is in the 10% tax bracket, meaning
the deduction is worth $310.00 per year to her. This is not much to give up
to avoid a child custody jury trial. If dad is in the 28% tax bracket, the
deduction means $868.00 to him. Many non-custodial parents think that their
child support goes for whiskey, dope, car payments and fast food. Modifying
the monthly child support or other financial concessions may settle the case.
Is it Crazy to Involve the Children in the Mediation?
Including the children in the mediation process may help the parties focus
on the harm the litigation is doing to them. Mediation is confidential, so
what the children say cannot be used in court. This could result in more emphasis
on parenting, and less focus on crushing the other parent in court. You must
be very careful that you do not harm the child during this process by changing
the focus from what is best for them to forcing the child into temporarily
siding with one parent. However, in the right circumstances, you may want
to consider suspending the mediation and resuming with the child and/or the
child's therapist joining in the discussions.
Suggested alternative possession orders.
Is one parent an airline employee, in law enforcement, fire fighter or
other job working non-standard hours? Does either side have a significant
amount of free time to take the kids to ball games and such? If so, modifying
the SPO to fit the parties situation could seal the deal.
Here are some ideas for possession orders that are alternatives to SPO
- Split custody - Alternating months
- Child spends January, March, May, July, September, November with one
parent, then February, April, June, August, October and December with
the other. SPO visitation with the non-custodial parent.
- Split custody - 2-2-5-5
- Begin with Monday, Tuesday for Mom, then, Wednesday, Thursday for Dad,
then Fri, Sat, Sun, Mon, Tues for Mom, then Wed, Thurs, Fri, Sat, Sun
for Dad. Then start over.
- Split custody - alternating years
- Non-custodial parent gets SPO visitation while the custodial parent
- Split custody - Alternating weeks
- Friday to Friday at 6:00 p.m., SPO visitation for holidays, each party
may designate one weekend in the summer for their vacation period (thus
giving the parent 10 consecutive days with the children).
- Split custody - split year
- Each parent has custody for six months, with SPO visitation for the
non-custodial parent. This will generally work best for kids under 5.
- Split custody - One parent has school year, the other parent the summer.
- If mom raises children during the school year, dad will have SPO visitation
during that period. Mom will have one 7 day period during dad's 3 month
summer period, with notice by April 1.
Examples of Possession Calendars (open in separate browser windows):
I have included a modified split custody order. (Click
here to continue)
You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please put "Gradel Law Office" in the subject line.
This web site is designed for general
information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed
to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.
Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice
regarding their individual legal issues.
Family law articles by Robert Gradel